Baca-Prieto v. Guigni’s Empirical Analysis
95 F.3d 1006 · 1996
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2011
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Yagow v. United States · Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. · Landon v. Plasencia · Greening v. Moran · Rosenberg v. Fleuti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'to ensure that the court of appeals was able to review an important legal question which the remand made effectively unreviewable.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“generally considered a nonfinal decision . . . not subject to immediate review in the court of appeals.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'may well be foreclosed from again appealing the district court's determination at any later stage'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.