Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

95 F.3d 1153

Docket No. 95-6279.

Powell v. Chater

This page is marked noindex.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-08-20

Relies on United States v. Walter Eldon Schlicker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-08-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2019

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before: BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.*

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Plaintiff, Gary E. Powell, appeals from an order of the district court affirming the decision that denied his claim for benefits pursuant to the Supplemental Security Income program.

¶2

Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the decision is supported by substantial evidence.

¶3

We therefore affirm the order of the district court for the reasons employed by that court in its Memorandum Opinion dated June 27, 1995.

*

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

/95/f3d/1153 · .json · Public domain