United States v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis
95 F.3d 14 · 1996
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2016
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · United States v. Hatchett · United States v. House
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'would definitely be involved in distribution versus personal use' " and concluding that "[e]xpert testimony that a certain quantity of drugs suggests distribution is admissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.