Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 F.3d 33 - United States v. Solomon

United States v. Solomon’s Empirical Analysis

95 F.3d 33 · 1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 2006
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5845 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Connally v. General Construction Co. · United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers · United States v. Mazurie · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we must take into account the “ ‘limitations in the English language with respect to being both specific and manage-ably brief ” and not deem void for vagueness those laws which are “ ‘set out in terms that the ordinary person exercising ordinary common sense can sufficiently understand and comply with, without sacrifice to the public interest.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.