Son Il Kim v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1256 (§ 246 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Balasubramanrim v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ezeagwuna v. Ashcroft · Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.