Ponce v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1542 · 18 U.S.C. § 911 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Raquel Sanchez-Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Hang Kannha Yuk v. Ashcroft · Woldemeskel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Michelson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Vatulev v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.