Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 FRD 403 - Notaro v. Koch

Notaro v. Koch’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc. (2002), Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. O'Connor (2000)

9 district · 1 state decisions

1501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Babolia v. Local 456, Teamsters & Chauffeurs Union · Gibson v. Bagas Restaurants, Inc. · K. J. Schwartzbaum, Inc. v. Evans, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a dearth of law on the availability of expedited discovery to speed relief where compelling need is shown. Nevertheless, in some cases a plaintiff could need expedited discovery to speed relief. In such cases, however, the court must fashion standards for granting leave that protect the defendant. ... Plaintiffs contend that without expedited discovery and the resulting earlier trial they will suffer irreparable damage, which they assert establishes compelling need for expedited discovery. In such circumstances, courts should require the plaintiff to demonstrate (1) irreparable injury, (2) some probability of success on the merits, (3) some connection between the expedited discovery and the avoidance of the irreparable injury, and (4) some evidence that the injury that will result without expedited discovery looms greater than the injury that the defendant will suffer if the expedited relief is granted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.