95 F. Supp. 2d 497 - Nish v. Cohen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2304 · 20 U.S.C. § 107 (Randolph-Sheppard Act) · 20 U.S.C. § 107D · 20 U.S.C. § 107E · 41 U.S.C. § 46 · 41 U.S.C. § 47 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Diebold, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.