People v. Florendo’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2019
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roe v. Wade · United States v. Calandra · Branzburg v. Hayes · Lego v. Twomey · 11 Cal. 3d 924 - Rudnick v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the public also has an interest in maintaining the breadth of the grand jury’s power to conduct investigations necessary to ferret out criminal activity”). Defendant’s contention predicated upon article 112 was directly addressed and rejected by our supreme court in In re May. The court there reasoned that a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““No physician or surgeon shall be permitted to disclose any information he may have acquired in attending any patient in a professional character, necessary to enable him professionally to serve such patient.” (Emphasis in original.) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 51, par. 5.1.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.