Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Ill. App. 3d 297 - People v. Freeman

95 Ill. App. 3d 297 - People v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Maus v. State (1987), 207 N.J. Super. 126 - State v. Reyes (1986)

31 state decisions

2201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Remington v. United States · 118 Ill. App. 2d 324 - People v. Walton · People v. Rodgers · 58 Ill. 2d 91 - People Ex Rel. Morrison v. Sielaff · Lock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not necessary that the sentences be spelled out with the nicety of a quadratic surd equation. Indeed, given the variables of good-time and other credits, no trial court could ever do so. The duty of the trial court is to make his intention clear and positively identify the sentences involved. [People v. Freeman, 95 Ill.App.3d 297, 302 , 50 Ill.Dec. 846, 850 , 420 N.E.2d 163, 167 (Ill.App.Ct. 1981).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.