95 Ill. App. 3d 910 - People v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 68 Ill. 2d 149 - People v. Perruquet · 67 Ill. 2d 449 - People v. Lawson · 55 Ill. 2d 172 - People v. Smothers · 33 Ill. App. 3d 12 - People v. Witherspoon · 57 Ill. App. 3d 256 - People v. Yancey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a defendant charges an irregularity or impropriety in the conduct of a prosecutor in a grand jury proceeding, the burden is on the defendant to show that the prosecutorial conduct complained of resulted in actual and substantial prejudice to him. [Citations.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.