95 Md. App. 104 - State v. Chertkov’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2000
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Benz · Brower v. United States · United States v. Blackwell · Belcher v. Government Employees Insurance · Sweetwine v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A sentence does not need to violate an express statutory provision to trigger the State’s appellate rights. Under authority of State v. Cardinell, 90 Md.App. 453 , [460,] 601 A.2d 1123 , [1126,] cert. granted, 327 Md. 129 , 607 A.2d 947 (1992) the State may note an appeal pursuant to Md.Cts. & Jud.Proc.Code Ann. § 12-302(c)(2) if the sentence imposed violates mandatory sentencing provisions of the Code or if the imposition of sentence is not in conformity with the Maryland Rules of Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chertkov v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.