95 Misc. 2d 1010 - People v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[p]ure weight drugs [such as marijuana] cannot as readily lend themselves to the process of analysis by extrapolation [as heroin].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 493 So. 2d 294 - Drane v. State

2. “test samplings may legally establish the existence of pure marijuana in the unsampled remainder.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 493 So. 2d 294 - Drane v. State

3. “if marijuana cannot be quantified, then no amount of extrapolation can change that.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 493 So. 2d 294 - Drane v. State