Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 N.C. App. 243 - Smith v. Pass

95 N.C. App. 243 - Smith v. Pass’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co. (1992), 117 N.C. App. 274 - Phillips v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education (1994)

25 state decisions

1501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bullard · Gillikin v. Burbage · State v. Coker · Gregory v. Lynch · 89 N.C. App. 584 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must view all the evidence that supports the non-movant’s claim as being true and that evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the non-movant, giving to the non-movant the benefit of every reasonable inference that may legitimately be drawn from the evidence with contradictions, conflicts, and inconsistencies being resolved in the non-movant’s favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The decision whether to exclude evidence due to the potential for unfair prejudice, confusion, or misleading the jury is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a showing that the ruling was so arbitrary it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining whether a violation of G.S. 20-161(a) has occurred, the trier of fact must consider whether the stop, even if temporary, was for a necessary purpose and “ ‘under such conditions that it [was] impossible to avoid leaving such vehicle in such a position. ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.