Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 NEB 255 - Shoff v. Ash

Shoff v. Ash’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1955
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1955

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

3019141920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holliday v. McWilliams · Howell v. North

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every contract for the sale of lands, between the owner thereof and any broker or agent employed to sell the same, shall be void, unless the contract is in writing and subscribed by the owner of the land and the broker or agent, and such contract shall describe the land to be sold, and set forth the compensation to be allowed by the owner in case of sale by the broker or agent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.