Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Nev. 419 - Reese v. State

Reese v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2006

22 state decisions

1801979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bates v. State Bar · Williams v. Florida · Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · 19 Cal. 3d 99 - People v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A defendant in a criminal case who intends to offer evidence of an alibi in his defense shall, not less than 10 days before trial or at such other time as the court may direct, file and serve upon the district attorney a written notice of his intention to claim such alibi, which notice shall contain specific information as to the place at which the defendant claims to have been at the time of the alleged offense and, as particularly as are known to defendant or his attorney, the names and addresses of the witnesses by whom he proposes to establish such alibi.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “testified that he had had `previous contacts' with [the accused] and his brother.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]here was no description of or further reference to these contacts ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.