Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 N.M. 28 - Diaz v. Lockheed Electronics

Diaz v. Lockheed Electronics’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2010

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

1101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of Brock · Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. Goffe · C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens Bank · 9 Cal. App. 3d 803 - City of Newport Beach v. Sasse · Martinez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “knew that they had no lawful authority to” intentionally confine or restrain the victim). Fuerschbach’s false imprisonment claim survives summary judgment under either standard. 10 . Because New Mexico has not adopted a specific civil jury instruction for assault and battery, the officers urge us to apply the elements of criminal battery, which include touching”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.