State v. Muniz’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kahm v. United States · Peary v. Connecticut · State v. Peary · Antone v. State of Arizona · State v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The principle objection to the use of an alias in a criminal proceeding is that an alias implies that the defendant belongs to the criminal class and thereby prejudices the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]here the defendant has used the alias in question, it is not improper for the evidence to go to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.