Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 N.M. 48 - Mowrer v. Rusk

Mowrer v. Rusk’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
4
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

2 district · 72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably State Ex Rel. Clark v. Johnson (1995), Gunaji v. MacIas (2001)

2 district · 72 state decisions

2601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sosna v. Iowa · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Massachusetts v. Mellon · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services · Humphrey's Ex'r v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “These mandates necessarily carry with them the right to quarters appropriate to the office and personnel adequate to perform the functions thereof. The right to appoint a necessary staff of personnel necessarily carries with it the right to have such appointees paid a salary commensurate with their responsibilities. The right cannot be made amenable to and/or denied by a county council or the legislature itself. Our courts are the bulwark, the final authority which guarantees to every individual his right to breathe free, to prosper and be secure within the framework of a constitutional government. The arm which holds the scales of justice cannot be shackled or made impotent by either restraint, circumvention or denial by another branch of that government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “N.M. Const. Art. VI, Section 3 vests superintending control in the Supreme Court over all inferior courts____ Any action of the executive or legislative branch of the municipal government which would preclude the Supreme Court or the district court from exercising its superintending or supervisory authority over the municipal court violates Article III and Article VI, Sections 3 and 13 of the New Mexico Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments, the legislative, executive and judicial, and no person or collection of persons charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments, shall exercise any powers properly belonging to either of the others, except as in this constitution otherwise expressly directed or permitted____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.