Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Ohio App. 3d 249 - Wray v. Fitch

95 Ohio App. 3d 249 - Wray v. Fitch’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2021

5 state decisions

201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Masheter v. Boehm · 56 Ohio App. 3d 37 - State Ex Rel. Pitz v. City of Columbus · In re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of Seas · 41 Ohio App. 3d 324 - City of Englewood v. Wagoner · State ex rel. Cincinnati Garage Co. v. Bird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Authorities are clear that there has been no compensable taking of an access right to property as long as there is some available right of way to the property, albeit circuitous in nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`Substantial interference' occurs when an owner is `prevented from enjoying the continued use to which the property had been previously devoted.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.