95 Ohio App. 3d 358 - Dellenbach v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “First, the writings * * * must be voluminous. This is a question for the court. Second, a proper foundation must be established for the introduction of the summary. As part of this requirement, the originals must be admissible in order that the summaries * * * based on those originals be admissible. * * * Third, the originals or duplicates must be made available to all litigants for examination or copying at any reasonable time and place.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Parsons v. Parsons, 07ap-541 (4-22-2006)

2. “The contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary, or calculation. The originals, or duplicates, shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. The court may order that they be produced in court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Parsons v. Parsons, 07ap-541 (4-22-2006)

3. “only that the medical expert opinion must be to the effect that the negligence probably was a proximate cause of the subsequent injury.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Haney v. Barringer, 06 Ma 141 (12-27-2007)