95 Ohio App. 3d 664 - Klesch v. Reid’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably 181 Ohio App. 3d 176 - Ramos v. Khawli (2009), 122 Ohio App. 3d 446 - Eiland v. Coldwell Banker Hunter Realty (1997)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Paugh v. Hanks · Osborne v. Lyles · Leibreich v. A.J. Refrigeration, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a party files a written request for admission, a failure of the opposing party to timely answer the request constitutes a conclusive admission pursuant to Civ.R. 56(C) in case of a summary judgment.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Unanswered requests for admission render the matter requested conclusively established for the purpose of the suit, * * * and a motion for summary judgment may be based on such admitted matter.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““We note that this court has adopted new guidelines concerning the application of Civ.R. 54(B) in determining final appealable orders since the two decisions in Klesch I [Klesch v. Bims (Apr. 2, 1992), Cuyahoga App. No. 60357, unreported, 1992 WL 67112 ] and II [Klesch v. Bims (Mar. 4, 1993), Cuyahoga App. Nos. 64049 and 64437, unreported, 1993 WL 58559 ]. Thus, if claims or actions against former parties were dismissed without prejudice at any time during the proceedings below, they will be treated ‘as if no action had been brought at all’ as to those parties. DeVille Photography, Inc. v. Bowers (1959), 169 Ohio St. 267 , 272, 8 O.O.2d 281 , 284, 159 N.E.2d 443 , 446. Therefore, pursuant to this court’s present guidelines, appellant’s appeal will be reviewed on its merits notwithstanding the dismissals of Klesch’s claim against Bims and Bims’ claim against Dominic Ozanne without prejudice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.