Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 OHIOST3D 264 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson (2007), Eppley v. Tri-Valley Local School District Board of Education (2009)

1 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

170200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Dandridge v. Williams · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Roth v. United States · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall solicit a person of the same sex to engage in sexual activity with the offender, when the offender knows such solicitation is offensive to the other person, or is reckless in that regard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Phillips, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2005)
  2. “All statutes are subject to at least rational-basis review, which requires that a statutory classification be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Burkhart
  3. “R.C. 2907.07 (B) is facially invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 2 Article I of the Ohio Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. State v. Phillips, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2005)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.