Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 OHIOST3D 524 - State v. Parker

State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

113 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Pratts v. Hurley (2004), State v. Williams (Slip Opinion) (2016)

113 state decisions

530200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Filiaggi · State v. Pless · State v. Green · 87 Ohio St. 3d 543 - State ex rel. Henry v. McMonagle · 73 Ohio App. 3d 546 - State v. Griffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant charged with a crime punishable by death who has waived his right to trial by jury must, pursuant to R.C. 2945.06 and Crim.R. 11(C)(3), have his case heard and decided by a three-judge panel even if the state agrees that it will not seek the death penalty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “neither R.C. 2945.06 nor Crim.R. 11(C) require an examination and determination by a three-judge panel [where a defendant is] no longer charged with an offense punishable by death at the time he enter[s] his guilty plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he three-judge-panel requirement of R.C. 2945.06 is a jurisdictional matter that cannot be waived. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.