Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Okla. 145 - Snell v. Canard

Snell v. Canard’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 1974
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1974

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

130192319301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lykins v. McGrath · Pickering v. Lomax · Lomax v. Pickering · Maharry v. Eatman · Brader v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It must be borne in mind that ‘the court having jurisdiction of the settlement of the estate’ of Sam Lucas was always in session. We have no desire to conflict with, much less to overrule, those cases which draw a correct distinction between a court and the judge thereof, and limit the power of courts to act in vacation; but the law says there shall be no' vacation in the county court in probate matters, consequently, the 'court having jurisdiction of the settlement of the estate’ of Sam Lucas is always in session.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.