95 Okla. Crim. 370 - Ex Parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2019
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 32 Okla. Crim. 217 - Ex Parte Grant · 17 Okla. Crim. 618 - Ex Parte Lyde · 88 Okla. Crim. 154 - Ex Parte Custer · 84 Okla. Crim. 118 - Ex Parte Conway · 75 Okla. Crim. 133 - Minter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the charging part of an information brings a crime within the provisions of a specific statute, descriptive label given to such charge by prosecutor will not bring crime within provisions of general statute prescribing a greater penalty, but the charging part of the information must be looked to in order to determine character of the offense.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The jurisdiction of the court to render a particular judgment and sentence by which a person is imprisoned is a proper subject of inquiry on ha-beas corpus.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.