Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Okla. Crim. 76 - Logan v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 76 - Logan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 1991

11 state decisions

6019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 94 Okla. Crim. 226 - Chaney v. State · 85 Okla. Crim. 14 - Bunn v. State · 93 Okla. Crim. 166 - Warren v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 44 - Garrett v. State · 91 Okla. Crim. 186 - Potter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every person who breaks into and enters in the night time the dwelling house of another, in which there is at the time some human being, with intent to commit some crime therein, . . . ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““1. Before a conviction may be sustained for the crime of burglary in the first degree all of the elements of the offense must be proved by the state, including the intent to commit a crime in the dwelling house, but this intent may be proved by circumstantial evidence. 2. The question as to whether one intended to commit a crime in a dwelling house is determined by the intent of the individual at the time the unlawful entry was made. It is not necessary that the crime actually be committed in the dwelling house, as a person who had the intent to commit rape might change his mind when confronted by a determined and outraged woman.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.