95 Or. App. 170 - State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he person knowingly induces or attempts to induce a witness to be absent from any official proceeding to which the person has been legally summoned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“subjective wrongful intent of the bribe offeror is the gravamen of bribe giving”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castillo“to avoid the necessity of proving a `meeting of the minds'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castillo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.