95 Or. App. 182 - Sealey v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited
4 district · 2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Notwithstanding ORS 12.115 or 12.140 and except as provided in subsection (2) of this section and ORS 30.907, a product liability civil action shall be commenced not later than eight years after the date on which the product was first purchased for use or consumption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sealey v. Hicks“(1) Any design, inspection, testing, manufacturing or other defect in a product;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sealey v. Hicks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.