95 Or. App. 225 - State v. Wickey’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Smith v. Illinois · Connecticut v. Barrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An adequate invocation [of the right to counsel] is `any plain reference, however glancing, to a need or desire for representation." State v. Wickey, 95 Or.App. 225, 230 , 769 P.2d 208 (1989) (quoting Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 534 , 107 S.Ct. 828, 835 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““An adequate invocation [of the right to counsel] is ‘any plain reference, however glancing, to a need or desire for representation.” State v. Wickey, 95 Or App 225, 230 , 769 P2d 208 (1989) (quoting Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 US 523, 534 , 107 S Ct 828 , 93 L Ed 2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.