Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 So. 2d 49 - Patterson v. Cargo Services

95 So. 2d 49 - Patterson v. Cargo Services’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 1974
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1974

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

80195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. National Surety Corp. · Fruge v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company · Bronson v. Harris Ice Cream Co. · Simmons v. Blair · Cummings v. Albert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t seems clear that, where the insurer suspends the payment of compensation, notwithstanding that the employee is admittedly totally or partially disabled, it must be cast for costs and attorney's fees, should the employee ultimately be held entitled to compensation. It is the calculated risk that the insurer takes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"1. Can it be reasonably assumed that the operation will relieve the situation and permit the claimant to resume the type of work he was performing at the time of the accident? "2. Will the operation submit the claimant to a minimum of danger and be in no sense dangerous to his life or be attended by no unusual risks and is it attended with but slight pain? "3. Is there no serious disagreement among the surgeons as to the necessity for the operation or the type of operation to be performed, and the probability that the disability will be cured without recurrence?"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““We are convinced that plaintiff’s ability to resume work can and will be restored from operations by a competent surgeon, and that such an operation will be attended by a minimum, if any, danger of ill effects. He owes it to himself, at least, to submit to such an operation rather than go through life, possibly a cripple.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.