Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 So. 2d 705 - King v. Mason

95 So. 2d 705 - King v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 1998 · most notably Kendrick v. Mason (1958), 67 Cal. 2d 679 - Insurance Co. of North America v. Electronic Purification Co. (1967)

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

20019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · National Bank v. Insurance Co. · Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Kearney · Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. · Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The first part of this definition is conceded to apply or refer to the warranty of goods or manufactured products, but it is argued that the second part of the definition has reference to contractors. We do not think the language of the contract and the endorsements and documents attached thereto warrant the conclusions urged as to this part of the definition; at least, the language used leaves the meaning vague, obscure and indefinite and it cannot be said, on this score, the policy is free from ambiguity.' King v. Mason, supra.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * The tort which was the proximate cause of the damages sustained by plaintiff was in fact and in law committed during the performance of the construction contract. Both the accident and the injuries resulting therefrom were brought about not from the completed and accepted sewer system but from the direct result of the acts of negligence committed during its construction. The policy covering said accidents for which premiums were charged was then in full force and effect; and the conclusion is inescapable that the insurer is therefore liable in solido with the insured, Mason."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"1. COVERAGE A—BODILY INJURY LIABILITY "To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained by any person and caused by accident."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.