¶1Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney’s fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney’s fees award).
95 So. 3d 321
Sharp v. Barreto
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 18, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-07-18
Relies on 862 So. 2d 876 - Levine v. Keaster · In Re Estate of Paris
Decided 2012-07-18