Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

95 S.W.3d 136

State v. Slater

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-01-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-01-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Antonio Slater appeals from his conviction of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

/95/sw3d/136 · .json · Public domain