Otto v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barber v. State · McLaren v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the `overt act' element of organized criminal activity need not be criminal in itself, acts that suffice for party liabilitythose that encourage, solicit, direct, aid, or attempt to aid the commission of the underlying offense would also satisfy the overt act element of section 71.02.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re LAS“he did then and there with the intent to establish, maintain or participate as a member of a criminal street gang ... commit[] the assault of [J.A.] by hitting [J.A.] with his hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re LAS
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.