Goldberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 248th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Batson v. Kentucky · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Wade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) how compellingly the evidence serves to make a fact of consequence more or less probable; (2) the potential the evidence has to impress the jury “in some irrational but nevertheless indelible way;” (3) the time the proponent will need to develop the evidence; and (4) the force of the proponent’s need for this evidence to prove a fact of consequence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.