Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 SW3D 537 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 262nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Goldberg v. Ellett · King v. State · Mosley v. State · Johnson v. State · Martinez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “error that directly offends the United States or Texas Constitution, without regard to any statute or rule that might also apply”; further stating that, “error is constitutional only if the correct ruling was constitutionally required”). 7 . The trial court need not define the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.