95 Wash. 2d 83 - State v. Bird’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 109 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Schaaf (1987), 96 Wash. 2d 183 - In Re the Marriage of Little (1981)
3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 93 Wash. 2d 751 - State v. Tongate · 91 Wash. 2d 654 - State v. Lawley · State v. Burroughs · 69 Wash. 2d 64 - State Ex Rel. Woodhouse v. Dore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever any person shall be convicted of any crime except murder, burglary in the first degree, arson in the first degree, robbery, carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of ten years, or rape, the court may in its discretion, at the time of imposing sentence upon such person, direct that such sentence be stayed and suspended until otherwise ordered by such court, and that the sentenced person be placed under the charge of a parole or peace officer during the term of such suspen sion, upon such terms as the court may determine: . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]rovide for punishment commensurate with the age, crime, and criminal history of the juvenile offender”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]rovide for the handling of juvenile offenders by communities whenever consistent with public safety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.