95 Wash. App. 751 - State v. Anaya’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Custody of Smith · 121 Wash. 2d 795 - In Re the Marriage of Kovacs · 120 Wash. 2d 439 - Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin County · 103 Wash. 2d 383 - Cox v. Helenius · Duke v. Boyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Violation of this order is a criminal offense under chapter 10.99 RCW and will subject a violator to arrest; any assault, drive-by shooting, or reckless endangerment that is a violation of this order is a felony.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marking · State v. Marking“clearly indicates an intent by the Legislature to limit the term of no-contact orders issued at arraignment to the period between entry of the order and trial. To read the above language in any other way would require that we ignore the words”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schultz · State v. Schultz“Because of the likelihood of repeated violence directed at those who have been victims of domestic violence in the past, when any person charged with or arrested for a crime involving domestic violence is released from custody before arraignment or trial on bail or personal recognizance, the court authorizing the release may prohibit that person from having any contact with the victim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.