95 Wash. App. 952 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Peterson · 81 Wash. 2d 155 - Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor Vehicles · 92 Wash. 2d 882 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Powell · Belas v. Kiga · 93 Wash. App. 762 - Fusato v. Washington Interscholastic Activities Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An inmate of a state correctional institution who is serving a sentence for an offense committed on or after August 1, 1995, commits the crime of persistent prison misbehavior if the inmate knowingly commits a serious infraction, that does not constitute a class A or class B felony, after losing all potential earned early release time credit.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Simmons · State v. Brown“that the problem of procedural safeguards discussed above would be further exacerbated by DOC's designation of new serious infractions subsequent to the passage of RCW 9.94.070.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“the trial court apparently accepted the proposition that the Legislature legislated with reference to the existing rules defining serious infractions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.