95 Wash. App. 967 - State v. Jacobsen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

26 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “To uphold a disposition outside the standard range, the court of appeals must find (a) that the reasons supplied by the disposition judge are supported by the record which was before the judge and that those reasons clearly and convincingly support the conclusion that a disposition within the range would constitute a manifest injustice, and (b) that the sentence imposed was neither clearly excessive nor clearly too lenient.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ogden · 102 Wash. App. 357 - State v. Ogden

2. “Here, although Jacobsen was ordered to attend the psychological evaluation, the appointment was arranged at a mutually convenient time and he arrived with his mother. Jacobsen was evaluated at the doctor's office and was not physically restrained in any manner. Further, Jacobsen did not ask for his attorney to be present during the interview and the court entered no order prohibiting counsel from attending. Finally, Jacobsen was free to leave and in fact returned home with his mother after the conclusion of the interview. Accordingly, we hold that Jacobsen was not "in custody" during the psychological evaluation.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Everybodytalksabout · 127 Wash. App. 776 - State v. N.B.

3. “(1) a state agent interrogates a person in custody; or (2) assertion of the privilege is penalized”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. NB