Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 1054 - Wilkerson v. Collins

Wilkerson v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 1054 · 1992

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Pofahl (1993), West v. Johnson (1996)

31 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

620199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Townsend v. Sain · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]ailure to present mitigating evidence 'if based on an informed and reasoned practical judgment, is well within the range of practical choices not to be second-guessed'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[w]e must strongly presume that trial counsel rendered adequate assistance and that the challenged conduct was the product of a reasoned trial strategy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “trial counsel interviewed [the defendant], his mother, and other relatives. Neither [the defendant] nor his relatives were able to supply the names of potential defense witnesses. Investigation did not reveal reason to suspect that [the defendant's] mental capacity was in any fashion impaired.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.