Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 1066 - Perales v. Casillas

Perales v. Casillas’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 1066 · 1992

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Powers v. Commissioner (1995), Marcus v. Shalala (1994)

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

370199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7426 · 28 U.S.C. § 2411 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 28 U.S.C. § 631 (Federal Magistrate Act of 1979) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 31 U.S.C. § 1304 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Thomas v. Arn · Pierce v. Underwood · F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co. · Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. Agyei

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantive specialization currently proliferating within the profession”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The narrowest reasonable construction of the cost-of-living provision ... leads us to conclude that this was an attempt to allow the statute to be self-updating in light of the modern realities of inflation. This purpose is accomplished through the award of historic rates...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Patent and Trademark Office administers a separate examination for admission to the Patent Bar, further restricting the pool of potential attorneys.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.