Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 1236 - Glover v. McMackin

Glover v. McMackin’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 1236 · 1991

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
6
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably United States v. Palmer (1997), Love v. Morton (1997)

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

2501991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Dinitz · Illinois v. Somerville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only where the circumstances positively indicate a defendant's willingness to acquiesce in the [mistrial] order”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “evincing a concern for the possible double jeopardy consequences of an erroneous ruling, he gave both defense counsel and the prosecutor full opportunity to explain their positions on the propriety of a mistrial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not constitutionally required to make an explicit finding of 'manifest necessity,' nor to establish on the record the full extent of its carefully considered basis for the mistrial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.