Durning v. CitiBank, N.A.’s Empirical Analysis
950 F.2d 1419 · 1991
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (1993), Regents of University of California v. Doe (1997)
58 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Edelman v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A decision may be reversed on other grounds, but a decision that has been vacated has no precedential authority whatsoever.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[1] whether a money judgment would be satisfied out of state funds, [2] whether the entity performs central governmental functions, [3] whether the entity may sue or be sued, [4] whether the entity has power to take property in its own name or only the name of the state, and [5] the corporate status of the entity.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Of necessity our decision vacating the judgment of the Court of Appeals deprives that court's opinion of precedential effect....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.