Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 1464 - Vaughan v. Ricketts

Vaughan v. Ricketts’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 1464 · 1991

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley (1992), Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc. (2003)

29 federal appellate · 4 district ·

3601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Bell v. Wolfish · Malley v. Briggs · Houston v. Lack · Johnson v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[q]ualified immunity is available to government officials if they could reasonably have thought that their actions were lawful in light of the clearly established law and the information they possessed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “be conducted with reasonable cause and in a reasonable manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]here the court had no record of when the appellant delivered the notice to prison authorities the proper course was to remand to the district court for a determination of whether the notice of appeal was delivered to prison authorities on time”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.