Ralph Ralph v. Nagy Md’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2014
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp. · Lee v. Georgia · White v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These issues are moot because the jury expressly found that the defendant did not breach his duty to the plaintiff under the appropriate standard of care.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Legg v. Chopra“to question witnesses to clarify and develop facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.