United States v. Mateo’s Empirical Analysis
950 F.2d 44 · 1991
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” 7 . Article 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights provides in pertinent part:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the 'reality of [Mateo's] self-representation' was unmistakable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.