Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 563 - Creighton Omaha Regional Health Care Corp. v. Sullivan

Creighton Omaha Regional Health Care Corp. v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 563 · 1991

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395X (§ 1861 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Hughey v. United States · Begier v. Internal Revenue Service · 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 372, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,391 Creighton Omaha Regional Health Care Corporation, a Nebraska Nonprofit Corporation v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Creighton Omaha Regional Health Care Corporation, a Nebraska Nonprofit Corporation v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services · Professional Medical Care Home, Inc. v. Harris · Mercy Community Hospital v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the Secretary is only obligated to pay for “costs actually incurred,” he may properly recapture claimed depreciation expenses where the value of the assets has not in fact declined. Moreover, attempting to distinguish the effect of actual consumption on an asset’s value from the effects of inflation and market forces “would pose formidable administrative difficulties.” Because of these difficulties, we find it reasonable for the Secretary not ,to refer to inflation or market forces when calculating what depreciation costs a provider has actually incurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.