Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 633 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 633 · 1991

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Gessa (1992), United States v. Burger (1992)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

300199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Lane v. Peterson · Norman v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as to each matter controverted [it] make[s] (i) a finding as to the allegation, or (ii) a determination that no such finding is necessary because the matter controverted will not be taken into account in sentencing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that when a defendant files a motion that tolls the time for appeal, the motion holds the notice of appeal in abeyance and the notice becomes effective upon the disposition of the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ministerial task of appending its determinations regarding disputed matters in the presentence report.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.